Featured Advertisers
Sat, Nov. 07  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Visit the Photo Place

Concurrent receipt: Is dialogue for real?

Lawmakers' sincerity on concurrent-receipt measure hard to sort out

Date published: 6/29/2003

MORE THAN 670,000 military retirees with VA-rated disabilities are ineligible for the new Combat-Related Special Compensation. Many wonder whether CRSC truly is a beachhead in the battle for "concurrent receipt" of full retired and VA disability compensation, or the end of the line on this issue.

That will depend on whether lawmakers vowing their support are sincere or pretenders. In the wake of CRSC, the signals are mixed.

Few members of Congress oppose legislation that would end for retirees with service-connected disabilities an offset of retired pay that occurs when they draw tax-free Veterans Affairs compensation. Rep. Michael Bilirakis, R-Fla., and Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., have championed the cause.

Bilirakis again this year introduced the Retired Pay Restoration Act of 2003 (HR 303), which would end the ban on concurrent receipt for all retirees with VA disabilities. So far, it has 341 co-sponsors; last year, it had more than 400.

Reid again intimidated Senate colleagues to insert a similar language in the defense authorization bill. Like last year, however, it is unfunded.

Rep. Jim Marshall, D-Ga., a House freshman and disabled Vietnam veteran, is trying a new approach: a discharge petition to force HR 303 out of the Armed Services Committee for a floor vote. He needs 218 signatures. As of June 25, Marshall had 193, but only one Republican, Tom Tancredo of Colorado.

Even HR 303's author, Bilirakis, has not signed it. An aide said he would prefer to try to work with his House leaders, to press them to support the Senate position during negotiations over the defense bill.

Republicans see Marshall's petition as an attempt to embarrass them. House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert knows, given last year's veto threat, that the Bush administration strongly opposes concurrent receipt.

Passage of CRSC clearly drained energy from the issue. Roughly 35,000 retirees with combat and combat-training disabilities will now receive from $104 to $2,193 more per month. Gone will be examples of persons scarred by war and, in effect, paying for their disabilities through reduced retired pay.

The Congressional Research Service, in a June 4 report on military retirement issues, said action on concurrent receipt in the 108th Congress, which runs through next year, "now seems unlikely."


1  2  3  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 6/29/2003