Fredericksburg.com - State needs to step up for rivers, Bay

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

A massive 'red tide' algae bloom in the mouth of the York River near Gloucester last month looks like a gigantic, swirling oil slick. It was the result of excess nitrogen and phosphorus in the river. Photo by Bill Portlock/Chesapeake Bay Foundation

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

State needs to step up for rivers, Bay
River-protection groups campaign for a steady source of money to improve water quality.
Date published: 10/21/2005

By RUSTY DENNEN

A coalition of Virginia river-protection groups has launched an effort to lobby state legislators for a major, long-term source of funds to address water pollution.

The Healthy Rivers Initiative, announced yesterday, comes at a time when biological "dead zones" in the Chesapeake Bay are the worst on record and the state's rivers face serious pollution threats from runoff, nutrients and toxic algae blooms.

"A historic opportunity calls for historic action for sorely needed funding to clean up Virginia's rivers," said Bill Street, director of the James River Association. "Together, [we] want to make sure the General Assembly hears loud and clear."

Others backing the first comprehensive lobbying effort of its kind are the Potomac Conservancy, Friends of the Rivers of Virginia, and the Fredericksburg-based Friends of the Rappahannock.

W. Tayloe Murphy Jr., Virginia's secretary of natural resources, who has sought more money to clean up the Bay, applauded the effort.

"Clean-water funding is critical to all of Virginia's waters, from local creeks and streams to our major rivers and the Chesapeake Bay," he said.

Persuading legislators to provide a permanent and substantial source of funds to improve water quality in the Potomac, Rappahannock, York, James, New, Chowan, Shenandoah and Roanoke rivers and their tributaries gained some momentum during last year's session when a one-time sum of $54 million was appropriated from the general fund to upgrade sewage treatment plants.

But conservationists consider that a drop in the bucket, compared with the estimated $1.8 billion it will cost to address river pollution problems over the next 10 to 15 years.

The coalition wants annual installments of at least $160 million, at a time when legislators have other, higher, priorities such as transportation and education.

Lawmakers agreed to revisit the issue in the upcoming session in January, committing the state to provide future payments and studying funding options.

Street said the coalition aims to bring other conservation groups on board and hire a lobbyist to push for the steady funding for water-quality programs.

To meet a 2010 Environmental Protection Agency deadline, Virginia has been developing plans and timetables to address water pollution. Under the federal Clean Water Act, in 1994 Virginia began water monitoring every other year.

Results have been alarming.


1  2  Next Page  


Date published: 10/21/2005



Comments guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Read and follow THE RULES.
4. We will block violaters and ban repeat offenders.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators 96.9 The Rock 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio