|
|
||
Date published: 1/20/2006
Caring about environmental issues, such as the fate of Crow's Nest or the establishment of an easement along the Rappahannock, doesn't mean the welfare of the poor isn't of equal concern ["We're worrying about Crow's Nest while people suffer," Jan. 8]. As a recent three-part series in The Free Lance-Star pointed out, low-income and minority populations often live in more polluted, unhealthy neighborhoods than wealthier citizens. Protecting sources of drinking water and improving air quality makes economic sense. Many localities are struggling to find funding to reverse problems caused by degradation of the environment. Conservation of natural resources and concern for people in need is not an either-or situation. The Stafford Board of Supervisors, the Fredericksburg City Council, and other local governing bodies have a challenge in seeing that the day-to-day functions of government are carried out. We expect certain services, whatever our income. Our local officials have an added challenge with a growth in population that leads the state and nation. These men and women are looking for solutions that will benefit all, including their families. Let's not create artificial divisions. When we pay attention to conserving natural resources and caring for our vulnerable citizens, we are building a better community for all. Helen Sanders Fredericksburg
1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
|
|
||||||||||||
