Featured Advertisers
Mon, Dec. 07  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Limousines searched during prom

DMV agents look inside; Belman driver refuses to allow access, citing clients' privacy.


Date published: 5/22/2006

By MELISSA NIX Department of Motor Vehicles staff brought a search tactic reportedly used at Northern Virginian proms a little farther south Saturday night. As limousines pulled up to Colonial Forge High School's junior-senior prom, DMV agents asked to search the vehicles.

Most drivers agreed to the searches, except for one.

Prom-goers began arriving at the Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center around 8 p.m. Once limousine drivers dropped off passengers, DMV enforcement agents asked to see chauffeur licenses and to search vehicles for alcohol and drugs.

Most limousine drivers submitted to the searches, but Jason Belman, of Elsie Belman Limousine and Sedan Service, refused to let agents search his vehicle.

He dropped off his passengers, Robert Hensel Jr. and Ashley Payne, at around 9:30 p.m, he said. And then agents pulled over his 2005 Lincoln stretch limousine and two other limousines. They asked for documents and identification, to make sure he was licensed to drive a limo. He was.

"Then they asked if they could search my vehicle," Belman said. "I said, 'I'd rather not,' because my clients weren't there and I did not know if they wanted their things gone through. So I said no. They kinda got rude about it then."

Belman said the agents said they would call a K-9 unit.

"I said, 'Please do. I'm not hiding nothing.'"

Dogs sniffed outside the car without problem, but Belman refused their entry.

He was detained in his vehicle for about 50 minutes because he refused the search, he said.

"Another reason I didn't want them to search the vehicle is because they said, 'If anything's in there, you'll be charged. You're the captain of the vehicle.' Later they tried to change their story, but I know what I heard."

He asked the agents to call a friend of his on the Fredericksburg Police Force. When his friend showed up, Belman said he was released.

"I did not let the officers search my vehicle," he said.

His aunt, owner of the limousine service, backs her nephew's decision. Elsie Belman said when a policeman contacted her for permission to search the vehicle, she said no, too.


1  2  Next Page  


Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 5/22/2006


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 14 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Probable Cause (posted by harleychick , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
I am sure there was moe than one young person that was 21. Did the DMV agents ask to search these other cars that were arriving? I can agree on checking credentials from the Limo drivers, for the safety of the passengers they are transporting, but without probable cause to search seems aliitle steep to me, if the driver was legal to drive, and the Limo passed inspection, then that should have been that! The Agents should have moved on to more important projects.

Belman is my new limosine service (posted by niteshiftprn , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
Maybe the DMV Agents should be used to serve the public in the service centers so the wait isn't so long instead of using taxpayers money in such a ridiculous way!

Belman a hero (posted by Malakand , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
Well done, it isn't easy to stand up to intimidation by governmental authorities. If DMV had a right to search by law they would have - since they did not, and were denied permission, they showed arrogance by insisting. Der oberkommando was defeated by democracy.

4th amendment (posted by , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
The drivers were asked if they could search, not forced! So the 4th amendment does not apply. The driver in the article did not consent and the officers found no reason to search. I will say the use of the K9 was stupid and a waste of taxpayer funds.

Snoopy1234? (posted by majstoll , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
What federal or Virginia statute or regulation delete's CDL holders' 4th Amendment Rights? Please provide cite(s). Mike Stollenwerk www.FairfaxCountyPrivacyCouncil.org

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.