|
|
|
|
All News & Blogs
E-mail Alerts
Red meat: Healthy in moderation when lean, but not needed for a good diet
-View More Images from this story Visit the Photo Place |
Slicing into a thick, juicy steak is a luxury many enjoy. But in this era of alarming obesity and heart disease rates, should anyone be eating much, if any, meat? With nutrition and tradition in mind, dietitian Jennifer Motl weighed some of the pros and cons of eating meat. Here are her insights.
The case for meat
STEAK AND PORK have long been
I once bought a gift for someone, a tiny silver pin with a pig on it. It was supposed to be a "good luck pig." Apparently, there's a German expression that when something lucky happens, you say "I have had pig." It dates back to olden times, when having pork to feed your family was a sign that you were fortunate.
Today, we still use phrases like "living high on the hog" to describe a life of luxury. And steak remains a celebratory dish.
Beef and pork are rich sources of protein and iron, helpful for strong muscles and for preventing one form of anemia. And I worry about adolescent girls who eliminate all meat in the name of health--in a few cases, this is the first sign of anorexia nervosa, an excuse to be on a perpetual starvation diet.
I am only a few generations removed from my farming ancestors, who ate meat often. Meat probably was very nourishing for my German, Bohemian and American relatives who worked hard outside all day, tilling fields, baling hay, herding dairy cows, chopping wood and carrying water.
I, their descendant, am not half as active. Nor are most people. And being under-active and overweight are problems that unmask any marginal food choices. It's well known that eating large amounts of fatty beef and pork raises the risk of many diseases. But lean cuts of meat, eaten in moderation, can be a rich source of nutrients.
Lean red meat, eaten
|



