Featured Advertisers
Mon, Dec. 07  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

-

Visit the Photo Place

Sherwood Forest drive

New law will bring hefty fines on July 1

Date published: 6/25/2007

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY has slipped one over on us. After struggling for two years to come up with a plan to solve Virginia's transportation woes, legislators finally struck a compromise. Alas, part of the new law is an open invitation for the fox to bed down in the hen house--and take a pound of flesh while he's at it.

Government should serve the people. That's the idea behind the American democracy. But government's constant temptation is to make too much of itself. Oppression and a heavy burden of taxation can soon follow.

The transportation package has some good provisions, but one of them is a sleight of hand that's just now coming to light. This provision permits the state to levy civil "remediation fees" for traffic offenses. Designed specifically to fund transportation improvements, these fees (think of them as "court costs," we're told) are simply outrageous.

Beginning July 1, slip up in your driving and you could be facing these hefty charges:

Failure to give proper signal, up to $3,000

Learner's permit violation, up to $900

Driving too fast for conditions, up to $3,000

Operating a motor vehicle with below standard tires, up to $900.

These "fees" are in addition to applicable criminal fines, and they can't be waived by the court. In a nice slap at state taxpayers, the exorbitant add-ons will be levied only against Virginians. Yankees headed south to Florida will get by with "just" a speeding ticket.

House Speaker Bill Howell, R-Stafford, often defends his staunch stand against an increase in the gas tax by suggesting that many Virginians simply cannot afford another dime a gallon for gas. How many can afford three thousand bucks for failing to use a turn signal?

Charitably, the bill allows miscreants to pay in the installment plan, over three years. It doesn't matter: The fees will devastate the young, the poor, the elderly on a meager income--all of whom, like the rest of us, are subject to momentary inattentiveness--in the name of avoiding "raising taxes."

Virginians should be outraged and signal their intentions, all right--by demanding the repeal of a schedule of afflictions that reflects the spirit of the Sheriff of Nottingham a lot more than that of any of our Founders.



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 6/25/2007


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 13 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Why stop there??? (posted by kv , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
This doesn't go nearly far enough! No turn signal? Lose your license. Speed? Stripped down and caned. Cause an accident? Public hanging! In all cases, seize vehicles and houses and auction them off. Since justice is off the table, these rules will be far more effective in raising money and reducing traffic violations. We can limit these rules to people with a SSN ending in an odd number, so we are not too harsh about it.

Yes (posted by homegrown , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
Bubbleman is right. A kid drinks bottled water on DC Metro and gets arrested. I mean this is ridiculous. The punishment should fit the crime.

you people are ridiculous (posted by bubbleman , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
The punishment should fit the crime. Determining the severity of a crime for it's influence on revenue generation is not very smart. The only fair way to maintain our transportation infrastucture is by a usage fee. That means GAS TAX, but nooooo, couldn't be fair about things. Let the poor jerk who had to take an important call with his kids in the car about a job interview so he can pay those back bills foot it. He can't afford a lawyer, so he won't beat the rap, and further fines for nonpayment......

Deal with it! (posted by YankeeRN , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
So, do you think breaking the law should get you a tax refund? You break the law pay the fine and penalties. Don't use a directional and get in an accident - a life is worth more than the $3,000 Penalty. Maybe that would be incentive to follow the rules of the road.

SueBee... (posted by hokisteph5 , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)   
I saw this issue covered on the news last week. The reporter said that if you couldn't pay the fees you wouldn't go to jail, you just wouldn't be able to renew your license when the time came. I'm sure that'll work...

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.