Fredericksburg.com - Tattoos are totally acceptable in our day

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Tattoos are totally acceptable in our day

Date published: 7/2/2007

This is in response to Di Thompson's recent op-ed ["Body art may have delayed consequences," June 22].

I would question a person's "character and intelligence" if they shared the same ideology as Ms. Thompson. Maybe back in the '50s tattoos did hold the stigma of teenage rebellion or "lack of respect for authority and the law," but today tattoos are accepted, embraced, and downright common.

I thought we as a society had risen above discrimination against others based on their appearances. Respect is something you earn; it's not given to you because of the way you look. This is something that is taught to even the youngest of children.

Alcohol equals tattoos? Any qualified tattoo artist will tell you that getting a tattoo while under the influence is not permitted. Alcohol causes your blood to thin, so when you get a tattoo you will bleed more, which becomes a hazard to both the tattoo artist and the one who is receiving the tattoo.

It's "a test of bravery"? Whatever happened to saying "no" to peer pressure? If you're dumb enough to let someone else tell you what to do with your own body, you deserve a cookie-cutter flower tattoo on your lower back.

Hepatitis from tattoos? Nobody said that getting a tattoo is without risk, but if you're smart you will do your homework and learn the steps to prevent contracting a disease.

People get tattoos for all sorts of reasons--some in memory of a family member who has passed, others have their children's names. Tattoos can depict mythological animals or patriotic flags. The point is that a tattoo is an expression of oneself. To judge someone based on their tattoos is no worse than judging somebody based on their religious affiliation. It all comes down to accepting others no matter how different they are or look.

Seneca Switala Spotsylvania



Date published: 7/2/2007



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 11 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Think as you wish...... (posted by gtogal , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
If you really think less of those people that really doesn't say a whole lot for you. You should never judge a book by it's cover.

Reality (posted by BigTuna , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
Perception is reality....Do you really think that I am going to hire someone with a house fly tattooed on the back of his neck or tiger stripes tattooed on his face? Everyone has the right to get tattoos but I also have the right to think less of those people.

mostly cover on FUG (posted by uncjohnny , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
most of these issues were viamently debated on FUG last week. the 1% of the "inked" population that wear "satanic" or "hateful" tats, do so knowingly, with a purpose of "shock" or "Hate" and to attract "like" thinkers. They are usually 100% successful. I disagree with there being being a "class" issue. If you want more you can go on FUG under "letters to the editor" boards.

There are differences (posted by BGILBERT , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
I think there is a big difference between some of the types of tatoos people choose to exhibit. When I see satanic references, sexually explicit messages or Nazi swasticas, then I find that disgusting. And as the letter writter states " they are expressions of ones self" If you would proudly display a swastica on your body, then you should expect to be scrutinized. If you choose to express your opinion on your skin, it better be thick.

Despite myself (posted by homegrown , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
I admit to liking tatoos on career enlisted military. The warrior CLASS (yes, CLASS) has marked itself thru history as symbol of pride and ferocity at some deeply human level. I know I'm going to get grief on this - unc is right: let it come!

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio