Fredericksburg.com - Allen, energetically<!---->

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Allen, energetically
George Allen is out, but he's not down
Date published: 8/10/2007

FORMER SENATOR George Allen may be out, but he's not down. Speaking recently to young conservatives in Washington, he decried "counterproductive taxes, impediments, and dictates" as a response to America's energy problems and global warming.

"Instead of trusting free people and the free markets," he said, "[liberals] believe the nation's energy policy is something best managed by political science. We need to reasonably conserve now, but we need more energy exploration, more energy innovation, more energy development, and more energy infrastructure."

By limiting our own oil production we are shooting ourselves in the foot, Mr. Allen thinks. He pointed out that "Castro with Hugo Chavez and the Peoples Republic of China are exploring 45 miles off the coast of Florida, but we prohibit our own oil producers from exploring 50 miles off the coasts of Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia."

Mr. Allen also encouraged use of nuclear energy, clean coal technology, and natural gas--as well as reasonable conservation methods.

His "we can do this" attitude is positively refreshing in an era when "America is the problem" has become a popular mantra and "woe is us" the common refrain. Mr. Allen has formed a political action committee, the Good Government Action Fund, and plans this fall to campaign for Virginia Republicans. His voice remains a consequential one.



Date published: 8/10/2007



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 4 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

lobbyist (posted by winwood , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
Sounds like Allen is positioning himself for a lucrative lobbyist job

Less Oil, Not More (posted by NET_VA , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
According to BP’s Statistical Review of World Energy for 2007 (google it), the US has only 2.5% of all the proven oil reserves in the world. The same report shows that we use over 24% of all oil that gets consumed in the world. As long as we use oil, we will be forced to import the majority of it. Mr. Allen’s comments ignore the biggest issue in energy today, that of global warming. To combat global warming, the US needs to lead the world away from oil, not find ways to get more of it.

Free Markets !!! Yeah Right !!! (posted by biosco , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
We should definitely let the free markets run the economy...because they did such a great job with the subprime lending issue?..... What George Allen meant was a "free for all". All those Wall Street bankers with derivatives, re-packaged loans, and other contrived debt instruments they make up to market to another Wall Street banker. Unfortunately, the music stopped and now they are all looking for a chair and placing blame on the other guy. Greed begets greed... Allen lost: get over it....

What about clean fuel? (posted by UsefulIdiot , Sep. 25, 2007 2:41 pm)    0 likes
George Allen does not mention solar power or wind technology, much cleaner, safer, and potentially more abundant sources of power than those listed in the editorial. Already, vast turbine farms are already springing up on the Great Plains. Maybe he's not pushing these sources because they didn't contribute to his campaign.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio