Featured Advertisers
Thu, Dec. 03  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Weapons permits may go secret

Bill would close access to state database of concealed handgun permits

Date published: 12/4/2007

BY CHELYEN DAVIS

RICHMOND--A state police database of concealed handgun permit holders would be off-limits to the public under legislation proposed yesterday by the state's Freedom of Information Advisory Council.

Reacting to a furor over The Roanoke Times' publishing of the database earlier this year, the council yesterday voted in favor of putting in a bill in the upcoming legislative session that would remove the database from public disclosure.

Currently anyone who receives a permit to carry a concealed weapon must provide their name, address and other personal information, which is then stored in court records and provided to the state police.

If the bill were to pass, anyone could still access the information on permit holders by going to each individual court clerk's office. But, said proponents of the proposed bill, that would make it a lot harder on anyone seeking the information for nefarious purposes, such as stalking someone.

House Majority Leader Del. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, said many people get concealed weapons permits after they've been victims of a crime, such as stalking.

"This is information that in many cases can be dangerous to the individuals," he said.

Taking the database out of the public domain wouldn't necessarily prevent those people from being found by, say, an ex-husband, but the person looking for them would have to know which locality they were living in to find the information, Griffith said.

But at least one FOIA council member argued that it doesn't make sense to limit the way the information can be disseminated but not the fact that it's public at all.

"It's a little bit insulting to the public as customers to say that it's ok for them to get it as long as it's inconvenient," said Craig Fifer of Alexandria.

The council, in an earlier subcommittee, had discussed allowing groups like political parties and nonprofit gun or hunting advocacy groups to still have access to the database--in much the same way voter lists are available to political parties--but eventually decided against that.

Philip Van Cleave, of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, told the committee he hoped they'd return the exemption for gun groups like his.

"This is kind of overkill the way it is right now," Van Cleave said. "We've had access for 10 years and we've done so responsibly."

The Citizens Defense League opposes the publishing of the same list, in particular by newspapers. The Free Lance-Star publishes new concealed weapons permits.

Griffith said he doesn't think anything in the proposed bill would bar a newspaper from printing information about concealed carry permit holders that it gets from courthouses. It would require only the state police to withhold the full database.

There also doesn't appear to be anything in the proposed bill that bars courts from putting the permits online, as they do with many documents.

Sen. Edd Houck, D-Spotsylvania, said he thought the proposal was "a good balance."

Chelyen Davis: 804/782-9362
Email: cdavis@freelancestar.com



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 12/4/2007


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 31 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Some should, Some shouldn't (posted by AtackDuck , Dec. 7, 2007 8:15 am)   
Patrick should not have fireamrs and chooses not to. We should respect his decision and right to not have arms, as he should respect our decision and right to arm ourselves. I'm not sure how he feels about calling the police who will come (with guns) to take his report of violence done him. Dial 911, Patrick, that will show those crooks who never visit your quiet neighborhood.

Its OK Patrick... (posted by Blk97F150 , Dec. 7, 2007 6:02 am)   
Patrick, its ok if you never want to be able to defend yourself if needed.... some people are like that, destined to be victims. BAAAAAA. The rest of us though, take the responsibility to proiect ourselves and our families seriously.

Guys (posted by patrick4hp , Dec. 6, 2007 10:42 pm)   
NOT! I live in a very quiet area, not a crime ridden area like Boston, geez. Again, I hate guns and wish they were never invented, end of story.

Guys (posted by patrick4hp , Dec. 6, 2007 9:17 pm)   
NOT! I live in a very quiet area, not a crime ridden area like Boston, geez. Again, I hate guns and wish they were never invented, end of story.

Guys (posted by patrick4hp , Dec. 6, 2007 9:16 pm)   
NOT! I live in a very quiet area, not a crime ridden area like Boston, geez. Again, I hate guns and wish they were never invented, end of story.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.