Fredericksburg.com - Rural Spotsylvanians would benefit, too, from joining VRE

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Rural Spotsylvanians would benefit, too, from joining VRE
Columnist says it's time that Spotsylvania County joined the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission
Date published: 6/1/2008

IREAD AN ARTICLE in the newspaper the other day that talked about Spotsylvania County's having no plans to borrow money to pave its 29 miles of dirt and gravel roads until at least 2012.

This apparently "surprised" Supervisors Emmitt Marshall and T.C. Waddy, who represent rural areas of Spotsylvania.

You may remember that during the elections last year, Mr. Waddy clearly stated that it was not his fault that his Livingston District roads were not yet paved.

But if Spotsylvania had agreed to join the Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission back in 1992 or any time since then, the excess money from the fuels tax most likely would have been available for paving dirt roads, expanding bus service, or any other worthwhile transportation project the county supervisors could agree on.

As I've stated on several occasions, it's not about the train, it's about transportation. The good folks in rural Spotsylvania have been duped into believing that only people who commute to jobs up north would benefit from joining the PRTC. That is not true.

It is true that joining would require a 2 percent fuel tax, but it is a fuel tax added into the price of gas. So if you drive, then it doesn't matter whether you commute or not, because you are already part of the traffic problem.

If you don't drive, you won't be taxed, but you still could benefit from the potential use of the funds to expand bus service and other means of public transportation.

Once again, it isn't about the train and it isn't about people who commute to jobs up north. The real deal is working with the organization to find solutions to our transportation problems.

The county would have to pay to join and establish a train station. But the money left over after the county pays the fees is money that can be used for other transportation projects.

County residents should remind their supervisors that a vote was taken in the 2005 bond referendum and residents supported building a train station in the county. The supervisors need to move on joining PRTC without all their special conditions. It's the only option that makes sense.

Michael Kole of Spotsylvania County commutes to Alexandria. Write him c/o Commuter Crossroads, The Free Lance-Star, 616 Amelia St., Fredericksburg, Va. 22401; e-mail
Email: newsroom@freelancestar.com.



Date published: 6/1/2008



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 7 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

should folks who live and work local subsidize commuters? (posted by larryg , June 2, 2008 3:32 pm)    0 likes
It's an interesting equity question Many folks who live and work locally do not make the higher salaries that NoVa commuters make and, in fact, usually cannot afford the same housing that is said to be "affordable" for those who commute ..often making twice the salaries or more of the folks who work locally. and that's the big blowback.... you've got folks making less money.. have it pretty hard finding an affordable house.. and they are told to support paying more taxes to subsidize NoVa commuters.

re: 2% tax and Smart Benefits subsidies (posted by larryg , June 2, 2008 3:27 pm)    0 likes
Just a question .. WHO do you think PAYS to provide the Smart Benefit Subsidiesk or the Van Pool Insurance? Is the idea that it's okay for the govt subsidies as long as it does not come out of the local 2% tax? How many folks would ride Commuter Bus and Vanpools without the Govt transit subsidies? these are questions.. no an advocacy of any or all... just pointing out that commuter rail and van is also subsidized.. if that is the main complaint..

None of you get it... (posted by ianrod , June 2, 2008 1:13 pm)    0 likes
The United States has the WORST transportation system of any modern country for just this reason. You the Spotsylvania farmer or blue collar worker see tangible results from things like this. Take the 1,000 cars off the road and that's 1,000 cars worth of time your goods get to market. Prices lower in shipping, you sell more stuff, everyone wins. VRE wants to expand from DC to Richmond and begin to bring in some other communities... this helps you too in the long run.

Nice try larryg to confuse the issue (posted by imready , June 1, 2008 6:32 pm)    0 likes
But it did not work. Metrochek is paid by employeers - mainly the federal govt - to employees who can trade it in on any transit choice they want. It is not paid for by a 2% gas tax. Van pool insurance is also not paid for by a 2% gas tax and it is so small as to be a laugh. $28 million to take 1000 Spotsy residents to work at $28,000 each is not a laugh. And all of US would pay for YOU to do that. Try again to make us believe that more taxes are the answer.

Martz and Quick are also subsidized (posted by larryg , June 1, 2008 6:28 pm)    0 likes
GOOGLE Smartbenefits or Metrochek. Van Pools are provided with subsidized insurance. If Spotsylvania BOS agreed to direct all money from VRE to fixing rural roads in the county - would that be a win-win? but the main point IIRc is that commuter bus benefits from Federal subsidies to employees who ride buses... and Vanpools could not operate if they had to buy common-carrier insurance so the Feds and the State provide subsidized insurance.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio