|
|
||
The pros and cons of circumcision. Date published: 7/6/2008
The American Academy of Pediatrics explains some of the reasons why parents choose to circumcise their sons:
A slightly lower risk of urinary tract infections. The rate of infection in the first year of life drops from 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 when a boy is circumcised.
A lower risk of cancer of the penis, though this cancer is rare for all men. A slightly lower risk of getting sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV. Prevention of foreskin infections and easier genital hygiene. Family history--often, every man in the family Societal pressure--parents don't want their sons Religious or cultural SAYING NO Parents who choose not to circumcise their sons often make their decision based Fear of the risks. Complications of circumcision are rare and usually minor. But they may include bleeding, infection, cutting the foreskin too short or too long, and improper healing. A belief that the foreskin Belief that circumcision causes a decrease in sexual pleasure later in life. Belief that circumcision isn't necessary for good hygiene--boys can be taught proper hygiene that lowers their chances of getting -Compiled by Marcia Armstrong from the American Academy of Pediatrics Web site, aap.org
This list is loaded towards circumcision. The UTI figures mean 991 circumcisions in 1000 are wasted, 990 because he wouldn't have got a UTI, and one because he does. With circumcision rates near 50%, he won't feel different from half his peers and he can be consoled that he has something the others don't. How do you console a circumcised boy who feels different? Why are doctors making "family history"? Why are all the excellent reasons for leaving a boy's body alone dismissed as "fear" and "beliefs"?
|
|
|||||||||||||
