Featured Advertisers
Tue, Dec. 01  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.


Visit Emily Battle's blog: City Beat

City tests housing rule

City tests excessive-occupancy ordinance


Date published: 10/12/2008

BY EMILY BATTLE

Just how many people are living in the house at 418 Morningside Drive?

Warren Carman, who lives next door and tracks the license plates of the cars he sees parked at what he says is a college student party house, thinks the answer is six.

When a city police officer knocked on the door after a complaint from Carman in August, the officer reported that resident David Rodriguez told him four people were living there.

A Fredericksburg ordinance says no more than three unrelated people can live together in a single-family home.

But until city officials last week charged Rodriguez, along with roommates Daniel McLaughlin and Samuel Shaefer, with violating that ordinance by living with at least one other person at the Morningside Drive home, no one in Fredericksburg had ever been taken to court over it.

That's because it's apparently not that simple to prove where someone lives.

After city Zoning Officer Debra Ward sent a letter to the home's owner, who lives in Maryland, he called back and said his tenant had told him only three people were living in the house.

When Ward visited the house with a police officer to inspect it Sept. 5, McLaughlin told her only three men lived there, according to city records on the case.

Ward's inspection notes show that in addition to the home's three bedrooms, she saw two rooms that had couches with sleeping bags and pillows on them.

McLaughlin reportedly told her that those were for the dog.

Fifteen days later, Ward made a late-night check at the house and saw more than 10 cars parked there.

Ward said she's hoping that Rodriguez's statement to the police officer who knocked on his door on that August morning will be enough to prove that the home is violating the city's occupancy law.

Violating that ordinance is a Class 3 misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $500.

These cases are some of the most aggravating to neighbors, but can be hard to gather evidence on.

Ward visits homeowners associations and neighborhood groups with a PowerPoint presentation that explains the ordinance and identifies the situations that tend to lead to violations--landlords who pack in too many tenants, families that take on boarders to keep up their mortgage payments, and students trying to save on housing costs are among them.

Enforcement of the ordinance is largely driven by neighbor complaints, and proving a case can require inspections and a good deal of detective work.

In 2007, Ward reported opening investigations into 53 alleged violations of the ordinance. Of those, eight were closed because the owner complied with the rule after being confronted, 32 were closed because the city could never get enough evidence of a violation and 13 were still pending at the end of the year.

Ward said she continues to monitor cases that she feels could yield evidence.

The case of the Morningside Drive home is scheduled for a Nov. 6 hearing.

Meanwhile, Carman is hoping there's an end in sight.

"Last year, it got so bad that the mail delivery stopped because they were parking too close to my mailbox," he said. "I don't know what else to do. I am hoping this can be resolved."

Emily Battle: 540/374-5413
Email: ebattle@freelancestar.com



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Read more stories about Fredericksburg
Date published: 10/12/2008


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 7 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

I will discriminate against ILLEGAL ALIENS (posted by savedbygracealone , Oct. 13, 2008 9:32 am)   
In the same fashion that I would discriminate against any other perosn breaking the law. southwest.....I"m sure that if someone broke into your house, hid in your basement, stole your food and raided your medicine cabinet for a few weeks undetected, and you suddenly found out they were there, that you'd invite them to come up to the guest room and appologize for not doing so sooner right? In my book, you line up the rear sight with the front sight and the target, and gently squeeze the trigger.....

However... (posted by onedayatatime , Oct. 12, 2008 10:05 pm)   
There are people in the city that are being kicked out of their current living situation who are born and raised in the US, who are not college students, and are good tax paying citizens. It just so happens to be there are four people living there and are being punished by the law because of people who are disruptive neighbors. Some of them are being given limited time to rearrange their living situation when other than being four people in a house, they've done nothing wrong.

the article (posted by VAG20T , Oct. 12, 2008 12:11 pm)   
Of course the people were not Illegal immigrants, but it's a problem. His comment while shameful were not dicriminatory, as Illegal Immigrants are known to house up 8 families in one house. The facts can't be considered discriminatory. In Mexico it may be the norm, even in the southwest it may be the norm, but not here. I have no problem with Hispanic Americans born here or otherwise Naturalized.

Illegal Immigrants (posted by VAG20T , Oct. 12, 2008 11:56 am)   
I don't see why people defend illegal immigrants. Just today news came out of Illegal Immigrants from Mexico are growing and processing marijuana in this nations National Forests. I find it a shame when I have friends from Britain that can't get residency in the U.S., but Mexicans can. 22 million plus illegal immigrants reside in the United States, you can't tell me that's been good on the economy. They flood the job market with cheap labor, making it even harder for AMERICAN's to get jobs.

Shameful (posted by louturks , Oct. 12, 2008 9:36 am)   
The truth hurts, don't it southwest

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.