Fredericksburg.com - Tricord to get more specific

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Tricord to get more specific
Commissioner seek more details about large development proposal before they recommend amending comprehensive plan
Date published: 10/21/2008

By DAN TELVOCK

Spotsylvania planning commissioners hit the brakes on Tricord Co.'s mixed-use Summit Crossing proposal near Massaponax because they don't know enough about the project.

Commissioners decided at their Oct. 15 public hearing to table the comprehensive plan amendment for Summit Crossing for 30 days. They will pick it back up at their Nov. 19 meeting.

The Summit Crossing proposal is a mixed-use development with approximately 5,900 residential units and approximately 3.6 million square feet of office space.

Before the rezoning process, Tricord needs an amendment because 57 acres of its 925-acre project are outside the area in the comprehensive plan where growth is targeted, called the primary settlement district.

The 57 acres are in the rural development district, intended to maintain rural and historic character and protect water quality. Tricord is seeking to bring the land into the primary settlement district.

Commissioner Cliff Vaughan said he wants to explore the project more before he votes on the amendment. He said on paper the project looks promising, but he hasn't seen any details about how this project will effect county services.

"I think the Planning Commission needs to have ongoing work sessions because of the sheer magnitude of it," he said. "I don't want to do this in a vacuum just because it sounds nice, and it does."

Tricord is proposing Tax Increment Financing to fund a new Interstate 95 interchange to relieve gridlock and Summit Crossing Parkway that would be a parallel road to Mills Drive.

A TIF uses revenue generated in the development to pay for the transportation improvements. That millions of dollars in revenue wouldn't return to the county coffers until the transportation improvements are paid for. The federal government must approve the interchange first and there is no guarantee that will happen.

"The interchange I think is something very much needed by our hospital," said Spotsylvania Regional Medical Center CEO Timothy Tobin during the public hearing.

Commissioner Mary Lee Carter, who also serves on the Commonwealth Transportation Board that doles out state and federal road dollars to localities, praised the developer for proposing ways to address the infrastructure needed to improve traffic flow.

Some commissioners said the complex proposals to pay for the transportation improvements need to be a part of the comprehensive plan amendment discussion.

Dan Telvock: 540/374-5438
Email: dtelvock@freelancestar.com



Read more stories about Spotsylvania
Date published: 10/21/2008



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 2 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Developers own Spotsy (posted by Sled505 , Oct. 25, 2008 8:32 am)    0 likes
Enough with large scale developments. The current trend of mowing down every tree on hundreds of acres just to squeeze big box cookie cutter homes into every possible square inch of land only serves to line the pockets of land grabbing developers. These subdivisions are ugly, add to traffic congestion, overburden the schools and overload utility infrastructure. Enough with these excesses. Go elsewhere.

why? (posted by lanier , Oct. 21, 2008 4:46 pm)    0 likes
Why does every inch of ground in Spotsy have to be covered with houses or stores? Some developer wants it because it is a moneymaking thing. Look around at all the empty houses ( there will probably be more with the economy like it is) and at how many empty buildings that are supposed to be stores or offices. Why can't we get them occupied before building more. The builders leave. We have to live with what they left behind

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio