|
|
||
CHILD ADVOCATE SAYS STAFFORD RAPE CASE SPOTLIGHTS FLAWS IN JUVENILE-JUSTICE PROCESS IN VIRGINIA
By PAMELA GOULD
Attorney Andrew K. Block Jr. says the case of a former Stafford County teenager convicted of rape in an incident the alleged victim now describes as consensual reveals the flaws in Virginia’s juvenile-justice system. Block, the legal director of JustChildrencq, a program of the Legal Aid Justice Center in Charlottesville, said the boy’s problems began not with an overzealous prosecutor or uninspired court-appointed attorney, though he thinks that contributed to the situation. “It starts—before you argue individual responsibility—with a system that doesn't have enough safeguards in place to make sure that kids are treated fairly, appropriately and in a way that justice requires and demands,” said Block, whose program works to address education and justice issues for juveniles. Among the systemic problems he cited are the unilateral authority of prosecutors to decide which teens get charged as adults. A Dec. 8 Virginia Crime Commission report shows that the vast majority of law-enforcement officials surveyed—with the exception of prosecutors—support changing Virginia’s system of assigning cases against juveniles. Currently, by statute, teens charged with certain felonies are automatically transferred to adult court for trial. For the other charges, including the ones brought against the Stafford boy, the prosecutor has the discretion. On the question of giving circuit judges the ability to send juveniles back to juvenile court, 93 percent of chief public defenders, 84 percent of circuit judges, 77 percent of court service unit directors, 53 percent of juvenile-court judges and the director of the Department of Juvenile Justice support the move. But 81 percent of prosecutors oppose it. Block said another problem with the juvenile-justice system is that juvenile court is not a court of record and thus proceedings are not transcribed and can’t readily be reviewed if errors or injustices are is? alleged. He described an overall view of the system as lacking the “same degree of seriousness” as adult court. He noted the lack of resources available to court-appointed counsel. By statute, they are paid $120 per case, though they can petition for additional funds. And he noted the disparity of treatment for black youths, males in particular.
Read more stories about Stafford Date published: 2/5/2009
number of juvenile sex offenders? What the hell kind of statement is that? What is the basis for it? Compared to what other Counties? Sounds like Mr. Prosecutor has pre-judged the juveniles in Stafford.
|
|
||||||||||||||