Fredericksburg.com - This VRE rider is not exactly a 'fat cat'

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

This VRE rider is not exactly a 'fat cat'

Date published: 2/15/2009

This VRE rider is not exactly a 'fat cat'

Not everyone who works up in Northern Virginia or Washington makes a huge salary ["Spotsy will help only 'fat cats' with VRE," Feb. 5].

Yes, I choose to work up in Alexandria and I don't expect any free rides, but to call me a "fat cat elite" is ridiculous.

I certainly don't get my VRE ticket for free. In fact taking the VRE is not cheap, nor is it convenient.

It's much easier for me to jump in my car and head on up I-95, but I wanted to do my part to have fewer cars crowding the highway.

I don't make a lot of money, but it's certainly a heck of a lot more than what I would get if I worked locally, even subtracting the cost of transportation.

I am a single parent with only my income, trying to provide a home for my sons and put food on the table, and each month it's a struggle.

I certainly would rather work in town. In fact, I did try for a while, but I was unable to make ends meet, and we do not lead an extravagant lifestyle.

Don't you think that if I were making a huge salary up north, I'd be driving up Interstate 95 in an Escalade or Lexus, not caring about how much gas I was burning and not bothering with the train?

Oh, and by the way, each day on the train, we "fat cats" from Spotsylvania County spend our commuting time comparing our furs and diamonds and looking down our noses at the little people.

Deborah Patterson

Spotsylvania



Date published: 2/15/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 3 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Stafford bought into the VRE ponzi scheme (posted by Ron_C , Feb. 15, 2009 9:39 am)    0 likes
And if Dana had her way Spotsy will make the same financially irresponsible decision. If it were such a great deal they wouldn't need to have it set up with no clause for a locality to withdraw from it. When Non-Stafford residents buy gas in Stafford they are still paying the tax, So if Dana gets her vouchers do we get that portion of our gas price back? I don't expect that, but I wanted to point out that not everyone buying gas in Stafford lives there, just take a look at the wawa by 95 on 610 any rush hr

At the end of the day Stafford subsidizes Ms. Patterson's ride (posted by Dana1 , Feb. 15, 2009 8:33 am)    0 likes
My Stafford gas tax money is unwillingly spent to lower the cost of her commute. It's money meant to help Stafford residents in her same situation, & the rest was meant to go to LOCAL road projects not Spotsy VRE riders. Stafford is the one paying to get cars off I-95. Spotsy should be doing its share. Not Staffords job to support both communities. Our gas costs the same as Spotsy, yet our gas tax goes to something. Where does Spotsy's extra gas cost go? Time for Stafford Vouchers, stop the freeloading.

the truth is (posted by larryg , Feb. 15, 2009 7:22 am)    0 likes
that by commuting you earn more than if you did not commute and worked locally. That is your choice - but your commuting expenses belong to you not to others and especially not those who earn less than you by working locally and not commuting. this is about basic fairness and equity - that each of us makes choices about where to live and work - for a variety of reasons that may well involve traffic and congestion but at the end of the day - you are the one responsible for the costs not others.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio