Fredericksburg.com - Extending Metro to city would cost four times as much as HOT lanes

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Rush-hour commuters wait to ride Metrorail in Washington. Expansion to the Fredericksburg area isn't in the cards.
Kevin Wolf/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Visit the Photo Place

Extending Metro to city would cost four times as much as HOT lanes
Extending Metrorail to Fredericksburg would cost $4.3 billion; HOT lanes cost $1 billion
Date published: 2/25/2009

By KELLY HANNON

Extending Metrorail to the Fredericksburg area would cost $4.3 billion, four times the $1 billion cost of building High Occupancy Toll lanes along Interstate 95.

For the extra money, Metro could carry 9,600 people an hour, versus 6,000 people an hour in HOT lanes on I-95.

But the Fredericksburg area is not expected to have the population, housing, and employment density needed to support heavy rail, like Metro, by 2035.

"We're not ready," said Lloyd Robinson, director of transportation planning for the George Washington Regional Commission.

A regional group, the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, asked the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation for a cost analysis of rail options.

Occasionally, Fredericksburg-area residents suggest extending Metrorail south along I-95 instead of building new High Occupancy Vehicle and toll lanes through a proposed public-private partnership, Robinson said.

FAMPO thought it should do an analysis to answer the questions, he said.

The results were presented Monday night to FAMPO's board, a group of elected officials and administrators from Fredericksburg, Stafford and Spotsylvania.

A heavy rail system could cost $60 million to $250 million per mile to build, according to state transit standards.

And heavy rail would be expensive to run once it's built. Metro requires $15 million a year from counties, and about $500,000 from cities.

Light rail costs slightly less: $50 to $150 million per mile to build, and it would carry about 2,160 people per hour. Building light rail to Fredericksburg would cost around $2.3 billion, according to the analysis.

By comparison, HOT lanes would add a third lane to I-95's two-lane HOV corridor from the Pentagon to Dumfries, and two new lanes from Dumfries to Spotsylvania.

It would be funded through $1 billion private investment with no local subsidy cost. Tolls raised from vehicles with one or two occupants would pay for maintenance and operation. Vehicles with three or more occupants could use the lanes for free.

Funding any new transportation projects in Virginia in the immediate future will be difficult.

Virginia expects to receive $2.6 billion less in transportation funds from 2009 to 2014. The state is collecting less money from sources of transportation funding: gas taxes, automobile sales, insurance taxes and real-estate recordation taxes. Last week, VDOT announced 450 of its workers will be laid off, and recommended closing 25 rest areas and cutting back on mowing and interstate maintenance.

Kelly Hannon: 540/374-5436
Email: khannon@freelancestar.com



Date published: 2/25/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 15 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

I wonder why Metro (posted by Mandrake , Feb. 27, 2009 1:00 pm)    0 likes
was never extended into Georgetown and further west...

This is a cost (tax) for which I would be... (posted by bhaas , Feb. 27, 2009 6:11 am)    0 likes
quite willing to pay my share. It would be one heck of a lot easier to swallow than some of the "pork spending" being inserted in the current fed budget and the previous "stimulus" package. One thing is for sure, our GA will not do anything for transportation. However, a Metro extension won't happen because the "politics" just are not there. In addition, it is my opinion that this "study" is fixed on the negative side; again for political reasons.

the next step (posted by larryg , Feb. 26, 2009 5:32 pm)    0 likes
is to refine the cost data a bit more and then tell everyone how much it will cost - per person - in the region ... and perhaps to put it on a referendum... and if that is what people want and they are willing to pay for it - why not? The study was done in response to more than a few folks who insist that we need to have rail - and those folks wanted to know the costs but I doubt seriously if they were asked to pay for it - that they would agree. That's the problem. Everyone expects "others" to pay.

Metro for Fredericksburg area would be GREAT (posted by Glamourcide , Feb. 25, 2009 3:30 pm)    0 likes
it would cut down the HEAVY traffic that is ALL over spotsylvania, stafford, and fredericksburg, helping the air pollution. It's better to build it before the demand becomes too high - and HOT lanes will not do any good by the time they are built, because the population will have grown EVEN MORE to where we need another. I VOTE YES FOR METRORAIL FOR FREDERICKSBURG AREA.

According to Mike Taplin, Chairman of the Light Rail Transit Assn... (posted by bhaas , Feb. 25, 2009 1:39 pm)    0 likes
"When we say tramway we mean streetcar in the American way of using words. In Portland they have a light rail line running from the city centre to the eastside (and now a new line to the westside). These lines are light rail because they are mostly segregated from other traffic, passengers get on and off at stations rather than in the street, and the cars run faster. The American Public Transpo Assn. classifies the Wash Metro system as light rail.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio