Featured Advertisers
Mon, Nov. 23  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS
  

Make a post about this story on FredTalk. Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.

Actor Richard Dreyfuss (right) sits with re-enactors while listening to Civil War Preservation Trust President James Lighthizer during yesterday's Washington press conference about the nation's endangered battlefields.
PETER CIHELKA/THE FREE LANCE-STAR

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

View the Culpeper County community page

Wilderness makes 'endangered' list

Academy Award winner Richard Dreyfuss brings star power to historic preservation; Wilderness battlefield controversy draws national attention

Date published: 3/19/2009

By CLINT SCHEMMER

WASHINGTON--It shared billing with 24 other battlefields, but the Wilderness got plenty of play yesterday as preservationists spotlighted America's most endangered Civil War sites.

The battlefield in Orange and Spotsylvania counties was mentioned several times as the Civil War Preservation Trust briefed the media on its 2009 "History Under Siege" report at a National Press Club news conference headlined by Oscar-winning actor Richard Dreyfuss.

It was the first historic site that CWPT President James Lighthizer named as he released the trust's yearly top-10 list of the nation's most threatened battlefields. The trust also announced 15 "at-risk" battlefields.

Wilderness exemplifies how some national battlefield parks face grave challenges from outside their boundaries, Lighthizer said. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. proposes to build a 138,000-square-foot Supercenter on commercially zoned land within a quarter-mile of the Wilderness battle sites preserved by Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park.

The trust and its allies say the Wal-Mart, anchoring other retail projects, will encourage sprawl at the gateway to the park and pour heavy traffic onto State Route 20, the heart of the battlefield.

"[The Wilderness] was a horrific battle, with tremendous slaughter, and yet the Wal-Mart corporation proposes building a monstrosity of a big box on the battlefield, though it's not on National Park Service land," Lighthizer told the standing-room-only crowd. "At the very least, it's going to denigrate that battlefield. And at the very worst, it's going to destroy part of it. Something proposed even on the outside of land already preserved can be a serious threat."

Maryland's Monocacy national battlefield, threatened by a proposed waste incinerator and its 200-foot-tall smokestack, falls in the same category, Lighthizer said.

But Dreyfuss stole the show, as the trust's chief readily admitted.

"This is like a parallel universe for me because I love history as much as I love acting," Dreyfuss said. "Had I not been an actor, I would have been a history teacher, and that's that."


1  2  3  Next Page  

10 MOST ENDANGERED BATTLEFIELDS

The Civil War Preservation Trust, which issued its first annual report on endangered battlefields in February 2001, named the following 10 sites yesterday as the nation's most threatened:

Cedar Creek, Va.

Fort Gaines, Ala.

Gettysburg, Pa.

Monocacy, Md.

New Market Heights, Va.

Port Gibson, Miss.

Sabine Pass, Texas

South Mountain, Md.

Spring Hill, Tenn.

Wilderness, Va.

The report also includes 15 other Civil War sites--including Hampton's Fort Monroe--as "at-risk."



Follow us on
twitter
fredericksburg.com Facebook page


Date published: 3/19/2009


Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 23 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

The land where my ancestors (posted by KiknBac , Mar. 20, 2009 5:48 pm)   
grew up has already been pave dover in the rush to build 1000's of homes along route 3 from Fred'bg. At the 3/20 intersection, there aree already strip malls, convenience stores, and even a liqour store. Where were the preservationists when all this was being built? The Civil War ended over 200 years ago, let the past go. We nee dto worry about the future incl job opportunities for everyone. WalMart can be held accountable for how the store looks and blends with the environment. I say build it.

Of course the land is "endangered" (posted by jasonmva , Mar. 20, 2009 9:45 am)   
the war ended how many years ago with the North winning? Can't that fact be accepted and move on or are you throughly convinced the South is just on hiatus.

More on Walmart... (posted by sparky507 , Mar. 20, 2009 9:19 am)   
Retail giant Wal-Mart will hand out its largest annual award -- $2 billion -- which includes bonuses to every part-time and full-time hourly employee. The $2 billion includes 401k contributions, about $1 billion in profit-sharing, millions of dollars in merchandise discounts and $933 million in bonuses. The average cash bonus for employees will be $667.

It does not help to have the anti-WalMart forces involved in this either (posted by larryg , Mar. 20, 2009 6:45 am)   
There are folks who don't like WalMart that don't give a whit about Historic Preservation including efforts to find compromise and their involvement is unhelpful to those who want to find a better outcome that must involve compromise. I think the way this is being portrayed regionally and nationally - ultimately HARMS the cause of historic preservation when people find out about the existing development that is often not even shown on the maps that seek to show how WalMart "threatens" the battlefield.

"too close" and "too late" (posted by larryg , Mar. 20, 2009 6:36 am)   
If Route 3 and Route 20 did not already have a 7-11, Sheetz, McDonalds and about 20 other businesses and the Preservation groups had worked with Orange County to designate that area as a Gateway AND worked to identify alternative commercial venues... then there would be amble room for "outrage" but it's really hard to understand how the proposed WalMart can be on the OTHER side of all of this existing "sprawl" development and make this case. It's really disingenuous to portray this the way it is being.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Username: Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.