|
|
||
Global Warming: Fact or Junk Science? Date published: 4/5/2009
VIRGINIA BEACH --In its April 28, 1975, issue, 34 years ago, Newsweek magazine publishedData had been collected that indicated a great cooling trend, including shorter growing seasons and smaller crop harvests. This led some scientists to believe the Earth was entering a new ice age, the effects of which would change--or, in the worst case, destroy--human habitation. Fast-forward to 2005: We are told global warming is the new threat to mankind. Further, we are told that human activity is the cause of this calamity; if we don't make extreme changes--immediately--to basic human activities, the world as we know it will end. Puzzled? Me, too. Consider this quote from the aforementioned Newsweek article. "To scientists seemingly disparate incidents represent Then comes renowned scientist Al Gore promoting just the opposite viewpoint. The Earth is warming and catastrophe is right around the corner. I have followed scientists on both sides of the issue, and I am convinced that no one is absolutely sure what is going on climate-wise. Activity on the sun's surface has more to do with our planet's climate than does any other variable. And, by the way, data are in that indicate that not only has the global climate not warmed over the past eight years, it has entered another slight cooling period. TAKING ACTION? Back to the 1975 article.
Date published: 4/5/2009
For the past 15 years I was convinced global warming was caused by CO2. Now, I'm not so sure. It's looking more and more to be a natural phenomenon. My interest in global warming and energy policy is so great I launched www.energyplanusa.com and have spent months trying to find the 'smoking gun' that proves global warming is man-made. But the evidence is just not there.
Global Climate Change, the phenomenon formerly known as Global Warming, and previously referred to as late as the 1980's as "Global Cooling", or "The Impending Ice Age" is the term currently used by liberals to cause fear within the masses in order to justify such things as Cap and Trade, and "Carbon Credits". These imaginary tokens of environmental awareness only have value in therealm of revenue generation. One need only follow the money to see who ultimately benefitts from this political charade.
did it to [*#@!] the pinkos so they can't go skiing at the north
pole any longer.
bwahahahahaahahahahaha. the simple fact of the matter is that Al Gore doesnt believe enough of his own BS to purchase green energy for his homes (which use over 250,000 Kw a year of electricity)
As a person with an actual Earth science (not biology) background I am very saddened that people have turned this issue away from science and into politics. Most Earth scientists will tell you that the jury is still out on climate change, that is as long as they are not getting funding from either side of the issue. Sadly the concentration on this issue deflects attention from other major environmental issues. The people who have little to no background continue to talk loudly, calling anyone else names.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||