Fredericksburg.com - Explanation given for beating pleas

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Explanation given for beating pleas
Fifth defendant pleads in beating
Click here to read the plea agreement

Date published: 6/18/2009

BY ELLEN BILTZ

A Spotsylvania County prosecutor said yesterday that charges were reduced against defendants in a high-profile beating case with the agreement of the two victims.

Prosecutor Brian Boyle explained the reasons for the lesser charges after the fifth defendant--John Mad-ison, 18--signed a plea agreement that reduces one count of malicious wounding by mob to unlawful wounding and drops one completely. It also allows for the judge to consider reducing the unlawful wounding to a misdemeanor.

The plea deals were offered to nine high school students charged in the beatings of two teens.

Boyle said after court that the commonwealth's attorney's office had agreed to plea agreements that included lesser charges after talking with the two victims.

"Our victims wanted a felony conviction, but assented to a reduction to unlawful wounding because they understand these are young defendants. They are defendants with almost no criminal record," he said. "Everybody was sort of understanding of that."

Several of the nine teens charged in January are known in the county for their athletic and academic excellence. Some are stars on the football and track teams with opportunities to start college in the fall.

Boyle said while that was taken into account, he still feels what they did was a felony, and he plans to argue that when the cases go before a visiting judge in August and September for sentencing.

According to the plea agreements, the judge will have the option of either finding the defendants guilty of the unlawful wounding charge or reducing that charge to misdemeanor assault and battery.

Boyle said while he plans to ask for a felony conviction, he understands defense attorneys have arguments to make for the lesser charge.

Eight of the nine defendants--Madison; Brock Bullock, 18; Kyle A. Brown, 18; Tyrik Jamal Denson, 18; De'onte C. Jones, 18; Jonathan R. Longtin, 19; Tajh H. Pendleton, 19; and Matthew W. Shepherd, 18--have accepted or are planning to accept the offered plea deal.

One other defendant, James Eugene Massey, 18, has said he wants to take his case to a jury in October.

Boyle also said he is not favoring the defendants because one of their mothers works in the Spotsylvania court system.

Boyle said he has been careful to make sure each defendant is treated equally and fairly throughout the process.

"We're trying to be as transparent as we can be," he said.

The next set of defendants is scheduled to sign plea agreements next Wednesday.

Sentencing hearings are set for Aug. 13 and Sept. 24 for those who have pleaded guilty.

At their arraignments, some defense attorneys said they wanted their clients to get early sentencing dates so they could be finished with the court system before they are scheduled to start school.

Massey's jury trial is scheduled for Oct. 22.

Ellen Biltz: 540/374-5424
Email: ebiltz@freelancestar.com



Read more stories about Spotsylvania
Date published: 6/18/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 29 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

so-called "athletes" (posted by kb57 , June 19, 2009 3:22 pm)    0 likes
The lawyers want to get an earfly sentencing date for these kids because they want it all over with before they start school in the fall? If these "athletes" are going to school on a scholarship, it should be cancelled. You do something like this that seriously injures someone, as far as I'm concerned, throw the book at them and stop making excuses just because they're "athletes". If you do the crime, then do the time--it's cause and effect; good choice, bad choice.

Aidia (posted by Mr_Reality , June 19, 2009 1:02 pm)    0 likes
What if they were 4 years older and all had just graduated college? Should they also then be given a little lovey slap on the wrist so they wont be stigmatized from society at that point in life? What if they were 10 years older? 15 years? They are old enough to know right from wrong and old enough to be held responsible for there actions and if not ... then nail there parents and make them do the time since they should have raised there children to know right from wrong.

Don't think they're thugs? (posted by fugyou , June 19, 2009 9:59 am)    0 likes
Well, you're wrong. They simply are. I have a feeling this is just the beginning of MANY years of experience with the justice and penal system these "men" are getting. Sadly, statistics aren't on their side, and it doesn't appear as if any of them want to do anything any different in their lives. So again, THUGS, the lot of them.

Ridiculous! (posted by 1beachbum , June 18, 2009 10:19 pm)    0 likes
The boys who ganged up on the 2 victims should be charged with the original charges and let the judge decide whether he wants to drop it to the lesser felony charge presented by the CA in the plea deal or drop it down to the misdemeanor charge as well. The ones who stood around watching and cheering it on should be charged as well. It is sad that our community has come to this

All who attended should be punished (posted by get_the_facts , June 18, 2009 8:44 pm)    0 likes
They should go back and charge all those cowards, that stood around and watched and cheered and when the time came, did not come forward. Those too should be punished!!! But when the time came, enjoyed there freedom.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio