Fredericksburg.com - Judge dismisses suits over nude photos

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Judge dismisses suits over nude photos
Federal judge dismisses lawsuits accusing Culpeper police of distributing nude photos found on cell phone
Date published: 9/5/2009

STAFF REPORT

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by a woman claiming Culpeper police officers distributed nude photos of her found on a cell phone seized when her boyfriend was arrested.

U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon of Charlottesville ruled Thursday that Jessica Casella did not have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" because she lent the phone to her boyfriend more than two months before it was seized and offered no evidence that she took measures to ensure the photos were protected.

"She therefore lacked possession, control, and dominion over the phone, as well as the power to exclude others from accessing the information and pictures stored on the phone," the judge wrote.

Casella and her boyfriend, former Culpeper schoolteacher Nathan Newhard, filed suit in U.S. District Court in Charlottesville in March against former Sgt. Matt Borders, police Chief Scott Barlow, "unnamed town of Culpeper police officers" and the town of Culpeper Police Department after Newhard was arrested on DUI charges.

The suit claimed that the arresting officer seized a cell phone from Newhard that contained several nude pictures of Casella and Newhard in "sexually compromising positions."

The suit alleged that the unnamed officer then shared the pictures with Borders, who alerted several additional law enforcement officers and members of the public "that the private pictures were available for their viewing and enjoyment."

Casella and Newhard said the actions violated their civil rights and rights to privacy and sought $350,000 in punitive damages each.

Moon also dismissed the lawsuit brought by Newhard, ruling that Newhard had no "clearly established" right to privacy.

"In the Internet age, the extent to which the Fourth Amendment provides protection for the contents of electronic communications (such as images stored on a cell phone) in a search incident to arrest or inventory search is an open question," Moon wrote.

Borders resigned from the force Dec. 31. Chief Barlow previously said the town had received and investigated a complaint about the matter and he was "confident that we handled the complaint appropriately and professionally."



Read more stories about Culpeper
Date published: 9/5/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 6 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Lesson Learned (posted by Opiniontoshare , Sep. 6, 2009 7:03 pm)    0 likes
Regardless of what the police officers did, the woman lost her expectation of privacy when she allowed her boyfriend to be in possession of those personal photos. For all she knew, he could have been showing them to his buddies around town. People need to use some common sense.

Why did the cops seize and view (posted by Mandrake , Sep. 6, 2009 8:45 am)    0 likes
the contents of a cellphone during a dui arrest? Did they take hia money and use it too?

Discreet... NOT (posted by DuBois_Culpeper , Sep. 5, 2009 11:42 pm)    0 likes
Culpeper's Finest... Horndogs. When you can't rely on police to assure your discretion is observed, it's a public disservice. Public service must be required of public servants; no?

Ridiculous (posted by travelin_bone , Sep. 5, 2009 9:00 pm)    0 likes
Searching is one thing, SHARING is another. Completely unprofessional and gratuitous. This woman is being treated very unfairly and I hope she pursues other measures if there are any.

Mandrake (posted by wildbill56 , Sep. 5, 2009 11:46 am)    0 likes
I don't think the picture was of nuts....

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio