|
|
||
Positive 'change' can occur without big government Date published: 9/6/2009
Positive 'change' can occur without big government
In the new Obama era, why must "change" apply only to government control? In this whole health care debate, change takes on the face of expanded government power and universal health care. Any other proposal is either ignored or shunned because it does not involve big government. There are several health care proposals coming out Recently, I read about Rep. Rob Wittman's support of a plan that addressed the need to help those with pre-existing health struggles that did not rely on government-controlled health care. It would also protect those who are currently on private plans who could lose their insurance if government-controlled health care came into play. Rep. Wittman and other like-minded leaders need Just because an idea does not require big government does not mean the idea cannot deliver change. Patricia Mellott Spotsylvania
and why don't they just insure everybody? Because
insurers make more money that way right? OR
How about you self indulgent, overeating heavy sugar
consuming, alcohol consuming, 1/2 pounder burgers with
large fries eating pie slurping beer sucking, pot, coke and
crack consuming whiners take some responsibility for your
self inflicted healthcare consuming bad habits.
until some Republican plan compels me to tithe to some already very profitable health insurance company that already made some very sizable campaign contributions to some Republican candidates.
Who is going to insure a person with a pre-exisiting (and expensive) condition? Its a bad investments. Companies are happy to take premiums from the healthy ... but avoid the 'pre-sick' like the plague. Ever heard of someone being dropeed from thier auto or home insurance because of too many claims? In this case the gov't assigns the person to a pool and requires a company to insure the auto or home (as astronimical rates).
|
|
|||||||||||||||
