Fredericksburg.com - Is it time we put ailing Bay on diet?

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

This mahogany tide, or algae bloom, on Norfolk's Lafayette River was caused by nutrient pollution, a major problem in the Chesapeake Bay system.
Chesapeake Bay Foundation

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

Is it time we put ailing Bay on diet?
EPA working on "pollution diet" for Virginia, other bay states
Date published: 10/30/2009

By RUSTY DENNEN

Like an obese patient at risk of a heart attack or stroke, the Chesapeake Bay needs to go on a "pollution diet" to survive, scientists say.

To that end, the Environmental Protection Agency is working with Virginia, five other bay states and the District of Columbia to prescribe a remedy that environmentalists hope will turn the tide in a decades-long battle to bring the bay back from the brink.

The EPA this week announced a series of public meetings around the state--including Fredericksburg--to help it prepare that pollution diet, formally known as a total maximum daily load or TMDL.

The meeting here will be from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Dec. 17 at Wingate Inn.

According to the Chesapeake Bay Program, a state and federal regional partnership created in 1983, poor water quality, degraded habitats and low populations of many species of fish and shellfish are ongoing problems.

It adds, "The [bay] and its rivers are overweight with nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment from agricultural operations, urban and suburban runoff, wastewater, airborne contaminants" and other pollutants.

John Tippett, executive director of the Friends of the Rappahannock, said the health of the bay depends on reductions in pollutants from runoff and sources such as sewage treatment plants.

Nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizer and treated sewage trigger algae growth in the bay, which leads to vast oxygen-starved "dead zones" that cannot support aquatic life. In addition, sediment, a serious problem in the Rappahannock, makes water murky and unable to support plant growth.

FOR has been involved in state TMDLs for local Rappahannock tributaries. But the process for the bay is a much larger undertaking.

"We're going to notify our members, and we'll be following it closely," Tippett said. FOR is part of the Choose Clean Water Coalition, more than 60 organizations pushing for federal leadership to help communities restore and protect local waterways.

"We've been pursuing a voluntary approach for decades, and it hasn't worked," Tippett said. "The [bay] TMDL is the first time we have an approach to cleanup that has substantial teeth across the board."

The effort, a combination of nearly 100 TMDLs for bay tidal rivers, will include limits on nutrients and sediment to meet state clean-water standards for dissolved oxygen, water clarity and algae.


1  2  Next Page  

Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin's bill would establish a $1.5 billion grant program for urban and suburban stormwater control and require the EPA to develop a cap-and-trade system to provide incentives for cutting phosphorus and nitrogen pollution.

A bill by Rep. Rob Wittman that recently passed the House would add accountability to federal cleanup efforts. The 1st District Republican's Chesapeake Bay Accountability and Recovery Act requires the Office of Management and Budget to prepare a budget for restoration activities in the bay watershed and requires the EPA to develop a management plan that would be updated every three years.

The 2010 Interior Appropriations Bill contains $50 billion for bay cleanup, with $19 billion earmarked for regulatory enforcement and accountability.



Date published: 10/30/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing all 5 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Ther is lots of data available (posted by Mandrake , Oct. 31, 2009 8:55 pm)    0 likes
but too many entrenched interests to do anything constructive. The problem has been studied to death. Just pass a law prohibiting any kind of discharge and runoff into Bay tributaries All sewage treatment plants near tributaries discharge "treated" effluent into the rivers. Do not believe that the discharge is clean and does not harm the environment.

I don't think you can begin to decide what needs to be done, how much, and where (posted by larryg , Oct. 31, 2009 5:21 pm)    0 likes
until you have a much better idea of what the status of the river is. We'll not convince enough people to do anything nor local officials to pass any ordinances until we can present compelling data that we all understand and that guides us towards what actions we need to take. You cannot do any of the above until you have watershed wide comprehensive water quality monitoring that tells you what is the water, in what concentrations and at what geographic locations. we don't know that we don't know...

So who among you is willing to support (posted by Mandrake , Oct. 31, 2009 10:35 am)    0 likes
a new State law that prohibits use of feritilizer that is not eco-neutral. How many farmers are going to pay big bucks to contain runoff from their farms? Who among us is willing not to use the garbage disposal in our sink? We talk a good game as long as it doesn't affect us directly. Yes, I am guilty too although I am trying incrementally to be a green weenie...

The TMDLs are way past due but the environmental organizations like (posted by larryg , Oct. 30, 2009 5:29 pm)    0 likes
FOR have not explained them to citizens so that those citizens could actually make substantiative comments to the EPA. Further - right now - citizens do not know the status of the Rappahannock River. They do not know how it compares overall to other Rivers in Va and they do not know for specific segments of the Rappahannock where the HOT spots are and the other spots which are not as critical. Without knowing this.. nor what the the actual sources are - citizens don't even know what to lobby for locally.

Everyone has to have their nice (posted by Lespaul , Oct. 30, 2009 8:28 am)    0 likes
green lawns so the fertilizer will continue until something is done about that. I see folks putting that crap down AT LEAST 2 times a year.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio