N.Y. trial is a mistake

November 29, 2009 12:36 am

Can someone please explain the recent decision by Attorney General Eric Holder to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others in federal court as civilians? ["New York, again," Nov. 18].

I don't see how the prosecution could ever get a conviction in this case, or at least one that won't be overturned in an appeal.

Mohammed wasn't "Mirandized," and he didn't have a lawyer present for questioning.

The jury will not be that of his peers, considering he is not a citizen, and a venue in New York should certainly prove to be biased.

Is the government prepared to reveal to the defense the method in which they obtained information or compromise their sources?

Aside from the trial itself, how can we currently justify the war on terror if these men have been innocent until proven guilty this entire time? Do we bomb the neighborhoods and shoot relatives of our accused murderers while they are in jail waiting for their civilian trials?

What about the added security measures that will need to be taken in New York? Sen. Charles Schumer is requesting $75 million for such measures, which would be unnecessary through a military tribunal in Guantanamo.

It is too easy for the defense to find mistakes and flaws in the investigation, arrest, and interrogation of these men.

As an American, I am appalled at the idea that our president is allowing and standing behind this risk. For what benefit?

Earl Pellegreen

Spotsylvania