Fredericksburg.com - Stafford looks at start date

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Visit Jeff Branscome's blog: Spot News
Stafford looks at start date
Stafford School Board to consider an earlier start date for students

Date published: 1/18/2010

BY JEFF BRANSCOME

Stafford High School junior Julian Khalili doesn't mind that his summer break ends after Labor Day--a couple of weeks later than in some area school divisions.

"We've been starting in September for a long time, and there haven't really been any problems," said Julian, 17.

However, a calendar committee of Stafford County parents, teachers, administrators and staff sees things differently. It has recommended to the School Board that opening day be Aug. 30 next academic year.

For years, Stafford's school year has kicked off the day after Labor Day. The earlier start date would give students more instructional time to prepare for standardized tests and other exams, officials say.

"It's really all about opportunities for learning, and the additional time that this presents," said Executive Director of Human Resources Rick Fitzgerald, who is on the calendar committee.

A public hearing on the revisions will be held at the School Board's Jan. 26 meeting. The board is scheduled to vote on the new calendar at its first meeting in February.

The committee also is recommending that spring break be earlier in 2011--April 18-22, the week before Easter.

Fitzgerald said teachers and principals supported the August start date during roundtables late last year with the School Board.

Still, in surveys distributed in February 2009, about 60 percent of respondents--parents, students and teachers--opposed an earlier start, Fitzgerald said.

Students in the city of Fredericksburg and in King George and Caroline counties also returned to school Sept. 8, the day after Labor Day, this year. Schools in Spotsylvania and Culpeper counties opened Aug. 24.

Stafford School Board Chairwoman Dana Reinboldt said reaction to the proposed new calendar is "running pretty much half and half so far for me."

She said some people like to take vacations at the end of August because they receive discounts.

"At this point, I'm not sure how I'm going to vote," Reinboldt said. "I really want to see what we get in terms of feedback from the public."

School Board member Doreen Phillips said she plans to support the changes.

One upside is that the school year would end a week earlier, she said. Some teachers have said not much happens in the classroom after spring Standards of Learning tests.

"By starting a week earlier at the end of the school year you do your SOLs, school's over, go enjoy your summer," Phillips said.

Stafford High School Parent Teacher Student Association President Judy Jobrack said last week she hadn't heard about the proposal but is fine with it.

"I think by then, what I see is, kids are ready to go back," she said. "They are bored, they miss their friends." She was not speaking on behalf of the PTSA.

Julian called the first week of class "get-ready" days. He said opening school a week earlier "probably won't make much of a difference."

"The serious stuff doesn't start for a while," he said.

Jeff Branscome: 540/374-5402
Email: jbranscome@freelancestar.com


The State Board of Education would have to approve an earlier start date. The board may waive the post-Labor Day requirement if a school division has been closed an average of eight days per year during any of the last five to 10 years because of inclement weather or other emergencies. From 2002 to 2007, Stafford cancelled school an average of 8.6 days per year. For the past two academic years, however, students have missed an average of 3.8 regularly scheduled days because of the weather.



Read more stories about Stafford
Date published: 1/18/2010



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 31 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

momto3 - it's teacher contracts (posted by Dana1 , Jan. 19, 2010 9:24 am)    0 likes
I have a teacher friend in CA who teaches year round. He concedes it is more expensive for the state.

Why would it cost more (posted by momto3 , Jan. 19, 2010 7:11 am)    0 likes
if the amt of sch days are the same. Instead of a 10-11 wk summer "break", those wks would be spread out throughout the entire year. An example of a year round schedule might be: 1st Term July 7 - Sept 4 2nd term Oct 1-Nov 25 3rd term Jan 4-Mar 5 4th term Mar 29- Jun 8

VA Dept of Ed is old school thinking (posted by DeanFetterolf , Jan. 18, 2010 9:43 pm)    0 likes
VA Dept of Ed is still stuck in the 60s and 70s. We need to educate our kids for their future not our past. The world is globally compettive. China and India have more honor role students than there are students in the US. Hopefully the new Gov will clean house at Dept of Ed.

schools shouldn't be teaching to the sols (posted by brightheart , Jan. 18, 2010 9:03 pm)    0 likes
in the first place. the kids would do better on the tests if the teachers taught like teachers who want to share their subject instead of drill sargeants for trivail pursuit. it's not so much the nclb law that's the problem, it's how states--especially va--have chosen to implement it that's wrong.

SOLS are MINIMUM peroformance (posted by DeanFetterolf , Jan. 18, 2010 8:15 pm)    0 likes
Your students are being taught to a minimum SOL passing level. Is that good enough for your kids and their future?

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio