Featured Advertisers
Thu, Sep. 09  -   -  Mobile  -  RSS | ALERTS |
YOUR TOWN:  Caroline | Culpeper | King George | Fredericksburg | Orange | Spotsylvania | Stafford | Westmoreland
  

Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Visit the Photo Place

Trappers question draft plan for river

Public weighs in on draft watershed property management plan governing Fredericksburg's riverfront conservation easement land

Date published: 2/18/2010

By RUSTY DENNEN

There were lots of questions about the draft management plan for Fredericksburg's watershed property. But at last night's public meeting at the University of Mary Washington, one weighty topic kept coming up--trapping.

A contingent of trappers, some with camo hats and vests, filled out question cards. Among them were Roy Foltz of Spotsylvania County and Roy Wood of Page County.

"The state of Virginia says we can trap" in the Rappahannock, Foltz said. However, trappers would have to cross the city-owned land to get to the river. As it now stands, trapping is not allowed, though hunting is.

Foltz and Wood said there are muskrats, beavers and raccoons to be had on the thin strip of land that runs along the Rappahannock and Rapidan rivers from Fredericksburg through portions of Stafford, Spotsylvania, Orange, Culpeper and Fauquier counties.

"Why are hunters allowed to hunt, and trappers are treated like black sheep?" Foltz asked. "All we want is a fair shake. Now, you've got us shut out."

Erik Nelson, the city's senior planner who worked on the document, said the comments will be considered, and he thanked them for coming, adding, "We won't shut you out."

Ron Hughes, wildlife lands manager for the state game department, said the agency had hoped for more public access points for boaters and others who use the river, saying that its recommendations have been "virtually ignored." There are few public boat ramps on the property.

The land in question is the 4,232 acres covered by a permanent conservation easement approved by Fredericksburg City Council in April 2006. The Friends of the Rappahannock received a grant more than a year ago to draw up a management plan for the property. A committee last night unveiled a draft of the document.

FOR, city staff, the easement holders--The Nature Conservancy, the Virginia Outdoors Foundation and the Virginia Board of Game and Inland Fisheries--and Lee Sillitoe, the watershed property manager, have been working on it. The first public session was held last March.

The aim is to balance growing recreational uses while preserving the river, its shoreline, wildlife and historic sites.


1  2  Next Page  

RIVERFRONT LAND

Fredericksburg purchased 4,945 acres along the Rappahannock and Rapidan rivers from Virginia Electric & Power Co. in the 1960s. The property runs over 20 miles upstream into Stafford, Spotsylvania, Culpeper, Orange and Fauquier counties.

The conservation easement, approved by the City Council in April 2006, covers 4,232 acres. The easement permanently restricts most types of development on the property.



Date published: 2/18/2010



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 10 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

watershed management plan draft (posted by bonniess71 , Feb. 22, 2010 3:18 pm)   
From an equestrian's point of view, I believe that we are a group that should be considered. When horse trails are constructed properly, there is no erosion and horse manure is "organic". Horse people are not as "opinionated" in public as other groups but our desires are genuine and we deserve consideration. Horse people "care" about trails and protecting nature and the environment. We have lost so many trails in MD and VA in the past. We can't afford to lose anymore. Thank you.

I wonder (posted by Guderian , Feb. 19, 2010 8:35 am)   
if they trap people who traipse through the thickets to get to the river..ouch!

Buy a muskrat, beaver, or raccoon? (posted by Lespaul , Feb. 18, 2010 3:46 pm)   
Maybe I'm thinking of a different type of trap. I know folks trap and re-locate beavers and pests, but wasn't aware people were killing for furs or whatever.

Trapping is very common (posted by kimcmitch , Feb. 18, 2010 3:13 pm)   
I trap all kinds of pests in my yard.

nop (posted by MBrookover , Feb. 18, 2010 2:46 pm)   
It's easier to buy it.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief: (512-character limit)
Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.