|
|
||
Emily Polak's op-ed on crisis pregnancy centers. For alternative view, visit: http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2010/022010/02282010/529013 Date published: 2/28/2010
ALEXANDRIA --We can wave our signs, plant our feet on either side of the "abortion debate," and disagree passionately over access to reproductive freedom. But there's one issue wrapped up in the choice conversation that isn't about abortion at all. Instead, it's about scientifically based information versus medically inaccurate myths and the commonwealth's 52 crisis pregnancy centers.This is a time where I ask us to put aside our disagreements and instead focus on making sure that women facing unintended pregnancies aren't deceived, scared, or lied to in order to promote a political or ideological agenda. We can all agree that women deserve access to real information on which to base medical decisions. The women of the commonwealth deserve our respect and the truth so they can make responsible decisions. However, all across the commonwealth, thanks to crisis pregnancy centers, there are women who are making decisions about unintended pregnancies based on lies, misinformation, and scare tactics. That is why NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia launched a yearlong investigation into the commonwealth's crisis pregnancy centers. There is no desire to shut them down, no ill-will toward the services that some of them provide with honesty and transparency. Rather, this investigation set out to determine if women, in difficult and often vulnerable situations, are entrusted with real information to make educated decisions about their own reproductive health and futures. Thirty-five of the crisis pregnancy centers in Virginia were found to share dishonest, deceptive, and medically inaccurate information with clients. These centers promote themselves as medical facilities when the majority do not have a licensed medical provider on staff. They advertise with the lure of a "free pregnancy test" yet they fail to mention their abstinence-only, anti-choice agendas. They also claim to uphold strict client confidentiality yet they do not follow HIPAA standards and violate client trust.
Date published: 2/28/2010
Origins-USA.org, the national 501(c)(3) non-profit organization representing mothers who lost children to adoption and protecting the natural right of mothers to nurture their children, supports NARAL's efforts to stop pregnancy centers from misleading pregnant women and mothers. Too often, these unregulated centers encourage mothers-to-be to surrender their children for adoption, based on misleading information about their options for keeping their child and the effects of adoption separation.
all she had to do is say no, I want to carry to term, that is her
decision! I would never want anyone else to make the decision
for me, even if it means my death, but likewise, I also don't
want anyone to make my decision based on their
beliefs/morals.
"pro deathers"? really. how is that not defamatory, false or libelous? Grow up and discuss the issues instead of posting gratuitous insults.
not Planned Parenthood.
Unfortunately, a lot of times PP's strongly recommend abortions. My sister (married, but with very little money) went in for a pregnancy test. PP's response to her, "It's positive, should we schedule an abortion?" She wasn't asked if she wanted to continue the pregnancy or if it was wanted (it was). PP DOES have an agenda (abortions=money)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||