Fredericksburg.com - History defiled here

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

History defiled here
Walmart vs. the Wilderness goes to the next round
Date published: 5/4/2010

ALL THE DIVERSE opponents of Walmart's plan to build a superstore in the Wilderness battlefield got a vicarious boost Friday when a judge allowed a handful of them their day in court. One Spotsylvania and five Orange county residents, along with the area preservationist group Friends of the Wilderness Battlefield, now can proceed with a suit which alleges that Orange County supervisors improperly permitted the retail giant to come squat on hallowed ground.

The chances of the preservationists' ultimate success are anyone's guess; ours is that Orange supervisors and Walmart will prevail. There is no law against public officials making myopic decisions or against grand gaucherie by corporations. Property rights, however, are constitutionally guaranteed. If Orange's political leaders--representatives of the people--made technical errors, they are probably easily correctable. Walmart's business plan--essentially the script from "It Conquered the World"--doesn't include scenes of defeat. Nobody is going to wear out Bentonville with litigation.

To be sure, a triumph for the tag team of provincialism and corporate power-lust would be a defeat for America. But it shapes up to be lawful and democratic--making it a self-defeat.



Read more stories about Fredericksburg
Date published: 5/4/2010



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 11 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

have you noticed (posted by soldat65 , May 5, 2010 11:47 am)    0 likes
that walmart is turning into a grocery store?

If you Walmart haters would just wake up one day (posted by Guderian , May 5, 2010 8:07 am)    0 likes
and understand that business is what makes our society great then we wouldn't continue to argue about where Walmart buys property and then gets hassled when they want to build on it. When you figure out a model for society that preserves every scrap of land where business is ALLOWED to build blah blah blah. When a company complies with existing law don't f with their plans once you take their money.

Translation, please (posted by hobbs , May 4, 2010 10:53 pm)    0 likes
This editorial states: "... a triumph for the tag team of provincialism and corporate power-lust would be a defeat for America. But it shapes up to be lawful and democratic--making it a self-defeat." Does anyone understand what that means?

They will win and build it because (posted by Lespaul , May 4, 2010 4:17 pm)    0 likes
You have to have a Walmart at a minimum of 2 every 5miles. I DO look forward to reading all the crime reports once its finished. Should prove interesting........

Walmart in Orange County (posted by icare , May 4, 2010 3:34 pm)    0 likes
1. I have never heard anyone who protests Walmart at the proposed location say they were against Walmart being in OC. They just want it to be in another location, away from the battlefield. 2. The lawsuit is being litigated pro bono by a prestigious DC firm in the belief that it has merit and can be won. 3. The plaintiffs are not "outsiders." All live close enough to the proposed Walmart site that Judge Bouton says they have standing to sue. Read his recent decision.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio