Fredericksburg.com - AREA PLANS NEW WAYS TO GROW

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.



Cosner's Corner at Massaponax has attracted commercial and residential growth as well as the new Spotsylvania Regional Medical Center. Officials are considering it as one of four Urban Development Areas in the county.
ROBERT A. MARTIN/THE FREE LANCE-STAR

View More Images from this story

Visit the Photo Place

AREA PLANS NEW WAYS TO GROW
Legislator explains why Urban Development Areas are being mandated in high-growth localities such as Stafford and Spotsylvania counties

Date published: 9/5/2010

By DAN TELVOCK AND JONAS BEALS

To comply with a Virginia General Assembly mandate, high-growth counties around the Fredericksburg area must have plans by next July for dense developments where people can live, work, shop and play.

These Urban Development Areas could look like small cities with a mix of different types of housing, stores and businesses. UDAs must accommodate at least 10 years and as many as 20 years of projected population growth. Economic conditions will impact how many UDA proposals localities get.

UDAs are envisioned as pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly communities that limit the need to maintain additional secondary roads and subdivision streets. A UDA could have narrower, more interconnected streets. These developments are supposed to be planned near existing infrastructure, such as commuter rail, highways, and public water and sewer.

The hope is the UDAs would preserve open space elsewhere because development in them is more compact.

The land-use policy changes originated from former Gov. Timothy Kaine's smart-growth platform. He wanted to tie land-use and transportation decisions together, in light of the financial strains that sprawling development puts on the Virginia Department of Transportation's budget.

Del. Clay Athey, a Republican from Front Royal, introduced the UDA legislation in 2007. He has been working on clarifying it ever since.

"It's probably the largest change in land-use planning since zoning itself," he said. "There will be gnashing of teeth over this."

The process has been complicated for local governments. VDOT has hired consultants to assist county and city planners with the process.

In Spotsylvania, Board of Supervisors members were confused last month after a state-funded consultant told them that land in a UDA would have to be rezoned so that the development would be allowed by right.

County Planning Director Wanda Parrish sent a memo to supervisors on Aug. 26 correcting the misunderstanding. A UDA would be part of the county's Comprehensive Plan, indicating that it's a preferred type of growth there, but existing zoning still stands.

For Spotsylvania and Stafford counties, one or more UDAs would be in the comprehensive plan.

In Spotsylvania, the UDA would accommodate at least 26,000 people--more than the population of Fredericksburg--over a 10-year span.


1  2  Next Page  

UDA DENSITIES

For localities with more than 130,000 people, a UDA would have these densities:

Single-family houses: 8 units per acre

Townhouses: 12 units per acre

Apartments: 24 units per acre

Commercial: 0.8 unit per acre.

Localities with fewer than 130,000 people must meet half of these densities.

With both counties' populations estimated at around 125,000, Spotsylvania is basing its UDAs on the higher densities while Stafford is using the lower densities.

Other area counties are well below the 130,000 figure.



Read more stories about Spotsylvania
Date published: 9/5/2010



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 8 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Mr. Bob has it right. VDOT is not going to (posted by larryg , Sep. 5, 2010 6:55 pm)    0 likes
come build the roads that are needed as a result of development. They never were - it was a ruse perpetrated by local developers cahoots with BOS. The name of the game has ALWAYS been to PRETEND that someone else will pay for the roads. It used to be VDOT but no more. 46 other states make the localities responsible for the transportation consequences of development. We need to do that in Va. If you want to propose a development then man up to the infrastructure needs that it causes. time to do this.

Yes, I have been there MrBob.... (posted by bhaas , Sep. 5, 2010 6:33 pm)    0 likes
and you parenthetically said the KEY words....(considering the size of the town). There is no comparison to this area and Front Royal from a transportation and development viewpoint.

ALSO... (posted by MrBob , Sep. 5, 2010 6:24 pm)    0 likes
Front Royal is a very busy area (considering the size of the town). Have you ever been there @ 5:30? Also, Richmond can use this principle. Everything's so far apart!

Stafford compared to Spotsylvania (posted by LocalTaxpayer , Sep. 5, 2010 6:22 pm)    0 likes
Most significant difference between ways each locality is handling UDAs is Spots asked their citizen what they wanted and where in public meeting called to discuss UDAs. Stafford has not had one such public meeting and Stafford refuses to let the consultant finish her work . . . before a vote is taken on UDAs this fall.

This is Important.... (posted by MrBob , Sep. 5, 2010 6:20 pm)    0 likes
A step in the right direction, the county can no longer approve subdivisions mindlessly without thinking of the consequences. It's time we stop asking for state for more money when we are the ones causing the transportation problem. We need to act. How? By managing the space we already have in a better way: http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2010/082010/08222010/568851 See? We'll be broke anyway from emergency services and road problems if we don't do anything anyway. Also, this gives more value to people.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio