07.28.2014  |   | Subscribe  | Contact us

All News & Blogs

E-mail Alerts

'This newspaper hereby endorses '


Date published: 11/24/2012

LEXINGTON

--Why do newspapers endorse political candidates? At best, it's an archaic practice, a little quaint, a little bizarre.

Other media don't do it. TV and radio news never have, in part because their roots are in over-the-air broadcasting, whose regulatory overlords traditionally frowned on opinion-mongering. Magazines--apart from partisan sheets whose politics are integral to their brands--shy away. Online, today's media are brimming with opinion, but none of the dozen or so Internet-based news sites I frequent explicitly support one candidate or another.

So what's with newspapers? Why is it that every election cycle, they routinely defy their own sinking revenues, shrinking payrolls, reader skepticism, and declining credibility, and tell us how they think we should vote?

And is this a good thing? Is it a neural twitch from a moribund industry that refuses to accept its own irrelevance, or the legacy of a proud tradition of public service?

This year newspaper endorsements have gotten more publicity than usual because a number of papers that supported President Obama in 2008 didn't back him this time. Their reasons varied, but the fact that this change of heart was noted is premised on the belief that newspaper support merits serious attention in a way that, say, backing from movie actors or rock stars does not.

Now, this respect paid to endorsements isn't because anyone believes they actually influence voters, at least on the presidential level. In fact, if there's anything analysts agree on, it's that newspaper recommendations don't move many votes.

Why should they? For starters, voters don't really view newspaper editorial boards as speaking with great authority, leastways not the authority that comes from having better information than the rest of us. Few of them have looked the candidates in the eye and taken their measure. By and large, if you've been paying attention you know about as much as the editorialists do.

Besides, by the time the boards finish stroking their chins it's so late in the campaign season that the kind of person who might still be swayed by an endorsement probably doesn't even read newspapers, and may not have the capacity to fill out a ballot anyway.

So it can't be superior insight or their likely impact on election results that make newspaper endorsements important. But they are important, I think, and for more fundamental reasons.


1  2  Next Page