Fredericksburg.com - Spotsy rejects mall road

search local
Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook

Get a printer-friendly version of this page. E-mail this story to a friend.
Make a post about this story on FredTalk.

Spotsy rejects mall road
In a surprise move, county votes unanimously to cancel the Harrison Road Connector by the Towne Centre indefinitely.
Date published: 8/11/2009

BY DAN TELVOCK

The Harrison Road Connector by the Spotsylvania Towne Centre will not be built anytime soon, if ever.

The Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors Tuesday night voted unanimously to cancel the road project indefinitely.

The decision surprised more than 50 residents who attended the public hearing on creating a special service district to pay for the road.

Not one of the speakers supported the project. Most of them live near the mall and would have been directly impacted by the 1.5-mile road that would have started behind the mall and ended on Harrison Road near Hazelwild Farm.

Contrary to what Supervisor Jerry Logan had told Waverly Village residents last month at a community association meeting, the mall company has no plan to sue the county if the road is not built. In 2006, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning for the mall under the condition that Cafaro Co. build the connector road. A promise that residential properties would never have to pay for the road was not followed, and attempts to rectify the situation didn't work.

"It wasn’t true," mall owner J.J. Cafaro said about the accusation that he threatened to sue the county. "I didn't want there to be any more misconception."

After the vote, Cafaro said not having the road built is "fine with me."

Residents urged supervisors not to create a special service district that included residential properties in the taxing boundaries. Some wore orange vests made out of trash bags and held signs that read "Stop Eminent Domain Abuse" and "Stop the SSD."

Although supervisors said those residential property owners would never have to pay an additional real estate tax as long as they did not convert their land to commercial or industrial zoning, the service district ordinance did not exclude those properties from the boundaries even though state law allows it.

"I think all of you should be ashamed yourselves," said Bragg Road resident Scott Smith. "This road was presented as a way to relieve traffic on Route 3. It was a total lie."

Those who opposed the road said it was being built to benefit developer interests and that it could lead to a lawsuit over eminent domain.


1  2  Next Page  

Spotsylvania supervisors last night unanimously approved a public–private partnership with WJ Vakos for a new government center at Courthouse Village behind Robert E. Lee Elementary on Brock Road.

The 56,000-square-foot building will house the planning, code compliance, social services and economic development departments on the second and third floors by 2010.

This building will replace the current rented space in Capital One, where about 150 county employees work.

The county will lease 36,000 square feet at $200 a square foot or about $11 million with a chance to purchase the entire building within five years. On the first floor will be commercial space and offices. The red-brick building will mirror the historic Princess Anne Hotel in Fredericksburg.

The county currently pays about $13.25 per square foot at Capital One, but that rate was to increase to at least $16 next year. The county will pay $15 a square foot to lease the building. That translates to about $45,675 a month. Vakos will pay up to $334,500 for furniture and moving data cable to the new building.

According to staff, the county will save at least $13,000 in employees’ salaries by avoiding the long drive from Capital One to the Courthouse area when staff members need to meet. The county also won’t have to lease high-speed data lines from Verizon, which costs about $40,000 a year.

—Dan Telvock



Read more stories about Spotsylvania
Date published: 8/11/2009



Most recent reader comments:

Viewing 5 out of 6 comments. (Sorted in reverse order, with most recent post at the top.)

Display comments on this page. | Sort:

PLEASE READ: These reader comments are not moderated. Each user is solely responsible for any message (s)he posts here. The Free Lance-Star does not endorse the views expressed within these comments. All users who post to this Web site must agree to the terms of the FredTalk User Agreement. We rely on our readers to police themselves, and report any content that violates our User Agreement. In accordance with our User Agreement, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms. Any reader can report inappropriate content by clicking the "Report this post to admins" link at the bottom of each comment. You need not be registered to report a post.

Misinformation? (posted by WaverlyGirl , Aug. 12, 2009 12:25 pm)    0 likes
Could you please elaborate on the "misinformation", GRice? I don't feel misinformed. And isn't everyone who has an opinion on this road filled with emotion and spin? Your post, with the words "duped" puts your own special interests into play.

This Road Has NOTHING to do with the Rt. 3 problem; (posted by WaverlyGirl , Aug. 12, 2009 12:18 pm)    0 likes
the plan was for it to end in a parking lot! Tell me how this would move traffic, bob367. Please be informed before posting. I didn't see you there at the meeting, either.

Some were actually for it... (posted by f4td4ddy , Aug. 12, 2009 7:13 am)    0 likes
...except they were against the perceived secrecy of the nogotiations and the illogic of proposed route. You can't have a road that will "improve traffic flow" that truncates at a parking lot, just as you can't have a road that will "improve access" that will carry commuters who just want to pass through. This one road could effectively achieve neither of these purposes. Hopefully the next proposal will be collector/distributor roads that run aside I-95 and impede less on current property owners.

Opponents probably got the right answer, but for the wrong reasons . . . (posted by GRice74 , Aug. 12, 2009 6:10 am)    0 likes
Opponents think they won this round by shaming the BoS into realizing the Connector was a bad idea. That, unfortunately, was not the case, & that's why this whole mess will, as Ms Swanson said, undoutedly surface again. It was obvious the core opponents simply duped the majority of their supporters through a campaign of misinformation, spin, & emotion which the Board had failed to effectively counter. With election coming, they retreated. The issue was not won on merit, & that's why it ain't over.

Thank you!!!! (posted by chipmunk , Aug. 12, 2009 12:08 am)    0 likes
This road was not needed, lived here all my life, Harrison road did not need the extra burden. Get used to the traffic on rt 3 or move elsewhere.

What do you think?
Enter your FredTalk username and password to post a comment on this story. If you are registered on FredTalk or another part of this site, use that login here. Otherwise, you can just REGISTER here... .

Posting guidelines

1. Be respectful. No personal attacks.
2. Please avoid offensive, vulgar, abusive, hateful or defamatory language.
3. Agree to read & follow THE RULES.
4. Use the "report to admins" link for posts which violate the rules. 5. Keep it on-topic. Posts which contribute nothing of value to the conversation will be deleted.

Username:
Password:

Post title:


Please keep it brief (Limit is 512 characters). Please note, attempts to circumvent this limit by making
multiple posts back-to-back (ex: 'continued', 'part1, 2', etc) will be deleted.

Please make sure CAPS LOCK is off. Posts in ALL CAPS will be deleted.)


By checking this box, you agree to the terms of the FredTalk User agreement.









The Free Lance-Star fredericksburg.com 93.3 WFLS Print Innovators Classic Rock 96.9 99.3 The Vibe wntx radio